Viewing 1 - 7 of 7 forums
-
- Forum
- Topics
- Last Post
-
-
BPG Organised Activities
All images from our organised photo-walks should be archived here so that our members can view them. Don’t forget, you are free to post your favourite images on your time line as well if you wish.
- 0
- No Discussions
-
BPG Organised Activities
All images from our organised photo-walks should be archived here so that our members can view them.
Don't forget, you are free to post your favourite images on your time line as well if you wish. - 0
- No Discussions
-
Differences between DSLR and Mirrorless cameras
The main differences as I see it are: 1. Because there is no mirror box and the viewfinder is electronic the cameras are more compact. 2. The electronic viewfinder enables you to pre-visualise the scene ‘in-camera’ as you compose the photo. You can crop the image in a number of ways (this only modifies the .jpg not the raw file which still uses the whole frame) and you can ‘see’ the image in black and white or with any number of different colour profiles for creative control. Finally, 3: Exposure is easier as you effectively have a ‘what-you-see-is-what-you-get’ view in an electronic viewfinder meaning that even with full manual settings you can see exactly the effect of shutter speed, ISO and aperture as you alter each aspect of the exposure triangle. The disadvantages are: 1. The electronic viewfinder is probably not as responsive as an optical viewfinder (although they are getting there). 2. Due to the shorter flange to lens distance in a mirrorless camera you cannot use legacy lenses (i.e. lenses intended for conventional DSLR’s) without using an adaptor tube which increases the overall length of the legacy lens reducing the smaller size advantage of a mirrorless system. 3. For flash photography you need to remember to put the electronic viewfinder into a special natural light ‘gain’ mode otherwise in a dark studio environment you cannot see to compose the image and focus correctly before you fire the flash.
- 0
- No Discussions
-
In-camera JPG versus JPG interpreted by post-production software
Here is a JPG image SOOC (Straight out of Camera) I took with various profiles set in camera to modify it – creating a moody, grainy, filmic-looking B&W image alongside a second JPG generated using my computer software from the corresponding RAW file. Note that in the second example I did not try to alter the JPG in anyway – the software is supposed to interpret and apply the exact same profile settings to the RAW file but the result looks nothing like the result from the camera. I think the SOOC JPG looks great and while I think we should always save the RAW files as well for future post-processing – I think there’s a lot to be said for JPG’s created in camera.
- 0
- No Discussions
-
Landscapes
The great outdoors!
- 1
- 1 year, 8 months ago
-
Public Forum
This forums’s content is visible to the public.
- 3
- 3 years, 2 months ago
-
Street Photography
People and places of interest
- 0
- No Discussions
-
BPG Organised Activities
Viewing 1 - 7 of 7 forums